This paper is not about the Battle of Milvian Bridge as a whole, I am researching how it was caused.

foot/endnotes and bibliography
standard one-inch margins
12-point font, Times (New Roman)
double spacing

There is a document attached and it has some of the beginnings of what I want to do with 2 scholarly articles to start with.
Add more sources as necessary, preferably from JStor.

Level 1:  Summarize!

Summarize the podcast(s) and sources from a single week of your choice.
    do not include external information or analysis   
    use prose, with paragraphs, as if in an essay (i.e. not in point-form)
    between 500 and 750 words (include a word count)
    the organization should be clear, with transitions between paragraphs
    information should be presented as a coherent whole
    include citations for the podcast(s) and sources


Requirements for all assignments
    completeness (all required items submitted)
    professionalism in writing quality and presentation: clear organization, no sentence fragments or run-ons, no more than two errors per 250 words (including citations in Chicago style)
    course relevance: must cite one or more podcasts and one or more o

It is July 5, 1776, the day after the Founding Fathers just committed an act of treason against the British by declaring their independence and establishing the United States of America. Were they in the right? Should the colonists fight for independence or should they be dutiful citizens with the rights of Englishmen? Make an argument, either in the form of a letter or a speech to rally your peers. (You are welcome to write in first person.) On which side should they be? What do you want them to do? What would you like to see as the outcome?
Introduction:
Create the setting. Provide historical background to give context for your speech. What
had happened in America in the previous decades? Also, identify who you are. (Are you an American? A Loyalist? A slave? You are welcome to choose a specific historical person, or you can just give a general position.) Where do you live? (In which colony? In an urban or rural area? Is it coastal?) What do you do? (Are you a merchant? Polit

Please refer to Paper 1 Prompt for the paper instructions. The prompt is about the memoir Black Boy by Richard Wright which I unfortunately do not have the e-book for but I have taken extensive notes (in Lecture Notes doc) and I am sure the sparknotes of the book would suffice.

Worlds Together, Worlds Apart (Concise Edition) Book
I would like you to reflect upon the possible connections that would tie the rise of Genghis (Chinggis) Khan to the era of intense spiritual and intellectual upheaval and questioning that preceded what came to be known as the Protestant Reformation over two centuries later in Europe. The Mongol expansion sparked a series of events that might provide us with at least one piece of the puzzle to explain what led society to question everything it had more or less quietly accepted before.  (I stress, this is a possible explanation of some of the many factors). Very specifically, I am asking you to consider disease as the particular engine of change here.
In essence I am asking you to follow the domino pieces.  Some of the domino pieces include the Mongol conquests, Mongol Empire, Trade, Plague, Depletion of Monastic Orders, Expanded Charity Requirements. Making the correct connections and linkages and expressing them well

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Describe the provisions (parts) of the Voting Rights Act that discuss the issue of preclearance.
2. Compare and contrast the views of those who think the federal government should have the
power of pre-clearance and those who do not. Include at least three points of comparison.
3. Using evidence from any election in 2014 or later, argue whether or not you believe
the federal government should have the power of pre-clearance relating to election laws.
Include at least three reasons and/or examples to make your point.
4. List at least two things you could do in order to engage in the political process in pursuit of
your position in (3) above.
5. Cite at least three (3) reliable, quality references within the body of the paper using the
Chicago Manual of Styles parenthetical citation style. One of the citations MUST come
from the class textbook (-10 points if this is not done). You must have at least three
parenthetical citation

This is a Strategic Rewards Management Exam Paper.

It is a brief case study with 4 questions.

Word Limit: 1800 words. *(The entire exam paper should consist of 1800 words, not each question 1800 words.) There is a penalty if the word limit is exceeded by more than 10% or is short by more than 10%.

Referencing: Chicago 17th B

I will attach the following documents:

1) The PDF is the Take-home exam (Lee Citizen).

2) PowerPoint file Exam Guidance - This details what is needed for the exam paper

3) Exam Guidance 5 - Further instructions for the exam paper

4) Screenshot Practice Case Study 1-4 - This different case study with answers will help you to understand what is required when answering the Take-home exam(Lee Citizen) questions in the PDF

5) PowerPoint MGMT3014 lecture notes to help you answer the Take-home exam in the PDF


It is very important that you read Exam Guidance 5. This mostly details what is required

Using primary texts supplied IN THE LINKS BELOW, choose two documents that support government intervention in the economy and two documents opposed to government intervention in the economy, and write a 820-word essay that demonstrates the arguments the proponents and opponents of government intervention used.  You should identify the authors main point and examine how they defended their position. NB: you are not expected to incorporate all of the sources listed, just those relevant to your approach to the paper prompt.

No secondary sources, other than the Cengage text, should be integrated into this paper's analysis.

Your paper should briefly introduce your paper's topic or question and provide a thesis statement. In a paper of this size, your introduction and thesis statement should appear on the first page, in the paper's first paragraph.
Your paper should show that you reasoned through the evidence in a fair-minded way. In other words, you should state (parap

PLEASE CHECK THE ATTACHED FILE FOR PREFERRED TOPIC YOU CAN WORK ON SO I CAN CHOOSE.

INSTRUCTIONS:

Instructions:

Research essay (due November 23): value: 30%, length: 8-10 typewritten pages of text, double-spaced, 12 pt. font. Include a bibliography and a title page with your name and student number, course number and the title of your research paper. The title page and the bibliography do not count towards the 8-10-page requirement. 
Minimum reference requirement for the essay is five monographs and five articles.

The research paper should include the following aspects:
- What sources did you use?
- What is your main thesis or topic question?
- How are you going to proceed or what aspects are you going to examine?
- What arguments do you advance to prove your thesis or answer the topic question?
- Integrate your sources into discussion to advance your arguments. You are expected to put forward your own thoughts and analysis. You

This midterm exam is focused on the Mexican-American War. This conflict not only destroyed the lives of many US and Mexican families, but transformed both of the nations involved. A new border was drawn, political sovereignty was restructured, and the US extended its frontier once again, while Mexico lost a massive amount of territory. Write an essay addressing both parts of the question below:
1) What were the causes of the Mexican-American War. 2) How did the internal political contexts of both Mexico and the US shape the march to war and its outcome?