Critical Book Review on Eric Barreto, Thinking Theologically.
Each student will complete and turn in a six-page book review based on Book Review Guidelines listed below. The review will carefully summarize the major idea(s) of the selected book and critically analyze the idea(s) advanced in the book taking into consideration materials discussed in lectures and readings from previous units, where appropriate. All papers must be written in the current Turabian 9th edition. Double spaced, 12 pt font, with 1-inch margins on all sides. Ensure proper documentation of footnotes and bibliography documented correctly.

1.    Identify and write a sentence or paragraph in the reading that made you stumble or caused a moment of aha. Describe why the particular sentence stuck out or caused a response in you. (Include the page number where the sentence is found)

2.    List and define (Using Gonzalez) words that are new to you

3.   

Critical Book Review on Eric Barreto, Thinking Theologically.
Each student will complete and turn in a six-page book review based on Book Review Guidelines listed below. The review will carefully summarize the major idea(s) of the selected book and critically analyze the idea(s) advanced in the book taking into consideration materials discussed in lectures and readings from previous units, where appropriate. All papers must be written in the current Turabian 9th edition. Double spaced, 12 pt font, with 1-inch margins on all sides. Ensure proper documentation of footnotes and bibliography documented correctly.

1.    Identify and write a sentence or paragraph in the reading that made you stumble or caused a moment of aha. Describe why the particular sentence stuck out or caused a response in you. (Include the page number where the sentence is found)

2.    List and define (Using Gonzalez) words that are new to you

3.   

Critical Book Review on Eric Barreto, Thinking Theologically.
Each student will complete and turn in a six-page book review based on Book Review Guidelines listed below. The review will carefully summarize the major idea(s) of the selected book and critically analyze the idea(s) advanced in the book taking into consideration materials discussed in lectures and readings from previous units, where appropriate. All papers must be written in the current Turabian 9th edition. Double spaced, 12 pt font, with 1-inch margins on all sides. Ensure proper documentation of footnotes and bibliography documented correctly.

1.    Identify and write a sentence or paragraph in the reading that made you stumble or caused a moment of aha. Describe why the particular sentence stuck out or caused a response in you. (Include the page number where the sentence is found)

2.    List and define (Using Gonzalez) words that are new to you

3.   

Replies:

Select two fellow learners questions (from DB 1) to answer. Provide a summary response for each of the questions. Your response should be cogent and concise, substantive, no less than 200 words, and edited for typos, spelling, grammar, and style.


in the additional material, you will one for student 1 and student 2

There will be two critical reviews of monographs. Each review will be 900-1100 words long and be modeled after critical reviews in academic journals such as the American Historical Review or The William and Mary Quarterly.  A book review concentrates on identifying and critiquing on the authors thesis. What is the author trying to argue, what evidence do they use, and do you agree and disagree? It is not just a simple summary of the book.

There will be two critical reviews of monographs. Each review will be 900-1100 words long and be modeled after critical reviews in academic journals such as the American Historical Review or The William and Mary Quarterly.  A book review concentrates on identifying and critiquing on the authors thesis. What is the author trying to argue, what evidence do they use, and do you agree and disagree? It is not just a simple summary of the book.

This is part one of two papers ( first an outline with at least 5 academic sources) and then a research paper of 4000 words. Which I will send you ( the research paper)  in a week.

Chicago style

I found a few sources
Http://www.jstor.org/stable/40163156

This is a Critical review not a book report, that is, it is not a recounting, nor a straight summary of the book, rather, it is an analysis of the overall book in historical context. The paper should be between 1,000-1,500 words, double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. font, cited in the Chicago Style (Links to an external site.) with endnotes or footnotes.


1. What is the background of the author? How is this relevant to understanding the purpose of the book overall?

2. What is the thesis of the book? How successful is the author at getting points across to the reader clearly and does the author ultimately prove what the thesis claims to show? Give factual examples of how and/or how not.

3. In the process of doing steps one and two above, consider the topic of the introduction, Who Rules the World, (previous readings have addressed this issue, from C. Wright Mills and G. William Domhoff to William Robinson and now Peter Phillips). For several chapters Phillips o

1. Watch this lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6kO09bIq34&feature=emb_title

2. Read the three articles uploaded as the additional materials.

3. Write an reflective essay (at least 600 words)
    - Presentation of thesis/position,reflection and conculusion of urbanism movement -- New Urbanism vs. Everyday Urbanism (based on the assigned readings).
    -  This essay should include reference to at least one urbanist from the article CityLab University: The Whos Who of Urbanism by Benjamin Schneider and the author(s) -- you can find this reading in additional materials.
    - This essay should include the following parts based on New Urbanism vs. Everyday Urbanism: 1. Main themes, 2. Theories and authors of the movement;3. Primary projects from the Movement ( New Urbanism vs. Everyday Urbanism); 3. Current status of New Urbanism vs. Everyday Urbanism movement / criticisms; and 4. Personal reflection/opinion of New

While Romans is by far Pauls most systematic letter, it was written to the Roman church in order to address specific concerns. Discuss the occasion, date, recipients, and purpose of Romans. Consider the following: Who founded the church in Rome? What was the situation like in Rome during this time? Who wrote Romans? From where was it written?