I need an informed essay at least 1500 words. Done ASAP please. This is how i need it.

    Introduction: State your field and present the debate(s)/mysteries/conversations youve chosen.
        Hook
        Thesis = subject + debate/mystery/conversation + importance/relevance of that issue to the field and/or in a broader sense
        roadmap
        Background Context: this is where you contextualize the issue by explaining how it came about, what conditions or information created the issue; what terms, concepts, or ideas are important to the issue; and in general, anything and everything the reader may need to understand the issue
        Section 1: identify the sides and/or positions in the debate, what their ideas/arguments/hypothesis are
       

Paper 1 Scott: Power and Identity

In Behind the Official Story, James C. Scott argues that nearly all social interactions involve some sort of performance or script but that in cases of marked or strong power difference, the stakes involved lead to increasing levels of scriptedness (3).

For your first paper assignment, I would like you to consider how Scotts argument about how power affects social dynamics might help us to understand identity better. In other words, how does ones relationship to power affect the way one understands ones identity?

There are different ways you may choose to go about answering this prompt: do power dynamics challenge or hurt ones sense of self, reinforce or solidify it, or does it depend? If it depends, what does it depend on? Does ones place in a power relationship create ones sense of self, or is there a more complicated dynamic at play? How so and how can we tell? Does ones sense of belonging to a group defined by relative power (

I need a informed essay at least 1500 words.
Introduction: State your field and present the debate(s)/mysteries/conversations youve chosen.
Hook
Thesis = subject + debate/mystery/conversation + importance/relevance of that issue to the field and/or in a broader sense
roadmap
Background Context: this is where you contextualize the issue by explaining how it came about, what conditions or information created the issue; what terms, concepts, or ideas are important to the issue; and in general, anything and everything the reader may need to understand the issue
Section 1: identify the sides and/or positions in the debate, what their ideas/arguments/hypothesis are
Section 2 +: cover each side in detail, summarizing their logic and/or evidence
Conclusion: your conclusion may present your opinion of the issue (although not persuasively, rather objectively); this is also the place to reinforce the relevance and importance of the issue, within the subject field and beyo

write a few sentences, saying something about what you see in your account.  I need a few meaningful sentences of analysis.  Something about why you bought or sold certain stocks.  Any surprises as the simulation progressed?  Did something work out as you expected, or better or worse?  Plans to sell or buy some stocks?  Did you use something you learned in the course?  Did something happen in the news that impacted your stocks?  Etc.  A few sentences should do it but make it meaningful. 

For your second essay you need to select a primary source essay. You can select that essay from Part 4 of your textbook. Part 4 is an anthology of essays covering a range of topics. Select one essay from Part 4 to use as your main essay to analyze. You will need to identift two additional resources to add to your analysis. Use the library to locate these two sources.

Be sure to use these outside sources properly. Don't plagiarize and review MLA citation methods!

https://msjc.kanopy.com/video/nova-cracking-your-genetic-code

above is a link to the video: It is called Cracking your Genetic Code Season 39, Ep 9. 53 Minutes long.

It does not need to be a full 550 words BUT it NEEDS to answer the essay questions below. 1 paragraph for each question.

1. In your words, what is meant by the phrase Genetic Code?

In the movie they obtained DNA from different sources, what were those sources? What other sources would be preferable? What sources would you avoid? Why?

3. One of the people in the movie said that if they tried they might fail, and that would be a good thing? Who said that and what did he mean?

4. They talked about a disease called CFwhat does that stand for? What part of the body does it affect? How much does the treatment for CF cost?

5. What do you predict for the future regarding peoples Genetic Code? There were two sides to the debate, what were they? Discuss each side.

Read "Why Facts Don't Change Our Minds" by Elizabeth Kolbert. And then discuss briefly your response to these questions:

Click on the New Yorker Article (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds)

The story is available as an ATTACHMENT here. (See below)

-- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that facts don't change our minds? And

-- From the point of view of a communications leader -- and you agree that facts don't change persons minds how then do you change persons minds?

For example, If you have been hired by an organization -- a company, consultant group, a university, etc. -- to get an organization to start doing things differently, how do you get them to change?

In thinking about this subject, make sure you understand the key points made in the article. And think about how you've come to change your mind about various subjects or topics. What were the influences that helped you change your mind?

write a page summary and reaction; follow the guidelines:
Be sure to write in accurate, complete sentences.
Be sure to include
o an accurate bibliographic entry for the text read
o a statement of the topic addressed
o a description of the area (what category? history, philosophy, geometry, etc.) o a statement of what appealed to you
o a statement about what is clearer to you due to this reading
o anything else you choose to express about the reading

Pick one topic and write an essay between 1,200-1,600 words in length. It is due Feb. 14 by 11:59 p.m. The grading rubric is at the end of this document. You must use at least two resources from class and at least three outside sources (news organizations, books, academic articles, think tanks).

Address four (4) of the following  five (5) questions in approximately 750-1000 words for each question. Additional research on the questions will likely be required but you will not need to include any citations or references. Your answers must demonstrate you command of the course content thus far as well as your ability to building upon given content with your own research, applying your opinions and practically apply what you have learned.
Sources that may help: Christopher, Norman. 2012. Sustainability Demystified: A Practical Guide for Business Leaders and Managers. Grand Rapids, MI: Principia Media.
Epstein, Marc J. and Adriana Rejic Buhovac. 2014. Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. 2d Edition. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
project drawdown
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/12/595/htm
gri 303 water and effluents
Know the Nexus-water, energy, food