Can Sexuality be Standardized?
Research on sexuality is particularly muddy because researchers cannot agree on definitions for describing hetro and homosexuality. This means every time you pick up an article on sexuality you will need to first determine what the researcher’s definition is before you can appreciate what conclusions are offered.
Many scientific disciplines offer strict definitions for describing, characterizing, and defining things: For example in anatomy an organ is defined as a group of tissues working together; In psychology the Diagnostic Statistical Manual provides a detailed description for every documented mental illness.
Take a stance:
Should the definitions for heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and bi-homosexual be standardized in the field of sexuality research? Can the definitions be standardized? What would your version look like?
Or
Should definitions be variable depending on the nature of the research; keep in mind this may mean excluding subjects (that do not fit a given definition), or altering definitions to suit a particular study? Give examples and provide any insight that you can. Why can’t sexuality be standardized to black and white terms?
You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.
Latest completed orders:
# | topic title | discipline | academic level | pages | delivered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6
|
Writer's choice
|
Business
|
University
|
2
|
1 hour 32 min
|
7
|
Wise Approach to
|
Philosophy
|
College
|
2
|
2 hours 19 min
|
8
|
1980's and 1990
|
History
|
College
|
3
|
2 hours 20 min
|
9
|
pick the best topic
|
Finance
|
School
|
2
|
2 hours 27 min
|
10
|
finance for leisure
|
Finance
|
University
|
12
|
2 hours 36 min
|