Each paragraph of the body of your research paper should be a cohesive unit. It should be tight, but developed. It should serve a function, and its purpose should always be to bolster the thesis. Therefore, you should use the following order for each paragraph in the body: 1. Topic sentence: This sentence summarizes the entire paragraph in one strong, well-written sentence, and it directly supports the thesis statement. 2. Explanation of topic sentence (1-2 sentences): Often there is more to be said about the topic sentence, more explanation that is necessary in order for it to be a clear idea, so there are usually a few sentences that follow that explicate the idea more for the reader. These sentences not only unpack the topic sentence, but they also anticipate the evidence that will be used to support the topic sentence, usually indirectly. 3. Introduction to evidence (1-2 sentences): No piece of evidence (quotation, example, paraphrase, etc.) should be dropped into a paragraph witho

Some of the reference should be from the Core Tax Legislation & Study Guide by Stephen Barkoczy 15th Edition, Australian Taxation Law by Woellner 22nd Edition and Australian Taxation Law Cases by R Krever 2012. PART A (10 Marks) Jennifer was employed as a medical practitioner at a private hospital in Concord. After many years of hard work, she decided to sell the following assets and used the money she received to travel around Australia:- 1.    Yacht sold on 6 June 2012 for $5,000 which she had acquired on 7 October 1999 for $15,000. 2.    Unique collection of stamps sold on 15 June 2012 for $3,000 which she had acquired on 6 March 1989 for $495. 3.    BMW (motor vehicle) sold for $16,000 on 17 June 2012. Jennifer had acquired the car on her 50th birthday for $25,000 on 15 March 2008. 4.    2,000 shares in a publicly listed company for $50,000 sold on 19 June 2012. She had inherited the shares from her father on 16 July 1989 when they had a market value of $5 each. He

You are required to write a summary and conclusion. It must be comprehensive, that is, integrate key concepts from each section of the paper to support your position. Later you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation of your paper. SLP Expectations: You are to submit a concise and clearly articulated summary and conclusion of the issue selected. (bioterrorism-anthrax) Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

In this paper i wish to cover the characteristic of comparison study of the restriction applies on intellectual property”3 main types” in the main aspect of: 1/ how IP can affect franchise contract " I want to add here also the relationship between the parties involved in franchise contract” 2/ the process to obtain IP right 3/ some of the restriction applies on certain goods “energy drinks, alcohol, oil, etc..” compare the flowing laws :California law -Saudi Arabia-brazil first before writing the paper i need to get approve from my advisor, so it will be better to provide me with an outline in order to have green light to write. also there are a few points I wish to add in the paper please include in this paper -references, resources and citation -table of contact -abstract -outline please send an outline first before start writing Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

You will need to research the various issues concerning the claim in order to answer the questions provided in the document. Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

With little real impact on state action. a.    Consider why this might or might not be true with reference to at least two of the theoretical approaches we have examined in some detail over the term. b.    Utilize not only theoretical ar this is a research essay, she expects to find reference to other sources along with those referenced in the syllabus. THere is a syllabus for this subject, with 10 topics. Theoretical approach does not mean international legal theories alone - it must be viewed as theoretical arguments that can be found from the first topics from the syllabus - till the point when it says: 'Practice'. In the theoretical arguments there must be reference to the theories as well along with the analization of the theoretical topics. One of the most important requiremtns for the assessment is to be able to show how you can use practice to illustrate theory/apply theory to practice! Thus, practice areas must contain discussion of the cases and other practical behaviou

Assignment 2 - LEGAL CASE STUDIES Question 1 Bert owned an early historic speed boat which he decided to sell for $50,000. Bert told his friend James and James said he was very interested and would Bert give James the first right to buy the speed boat. Bert agreed to do so. After a few weeks Bert asked James if he still wanted to buy the speed boat. James said he was seriously thinking about it. Bert told James he was going to advertise the speed boat “for sale at $60,000 or near offer” on the Historic Speed Boat Club’s notice board. In response to the advertisement in the club Bert received a telephone call from Alphonse. Bert told Alphonse the speed boat was for sale “But someone has right of first refusal.” Alphonse then expressed surprise and asked Bert if he was selling or not. Bert said he was selling the speed boat for $60,000 or near offer and invited Alphonse to call and inspect the boat. Alphonse called on Bert and after inspecting the boat offered Bert $50,000 f

Based on your understanding of From Revolution to Reform: A Brief History of U.S. Intelligence, conduct a case study to identify the origins and reasons for creating a centralized intelligence collection apparatus to protect the U.S. homeland. Answer the following questions. When did the U.S. begin conducting intelligence collection activities? When did the U.S. formalize these collection activities into a centralized federal effort? What intelligence was the initial centralized system designed to collect? What impact does the initial intelligence apparatus has on current intelligence structure, purpose, and efforts? The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources (at least one of which can be found in the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit

Assignment 2 - LEGAL CASE STUDIES Question 1 Bert owned an early historic speed boat which he decided to sell for $50,000. Bert told his friend James and James said he was very interested and would Bert give James the first right to buy the speed boat. Bert agreed to do so. After a few weeks Bert asked James if he still wanted to buy the speed boat. James said he was seriously thinking about it. Bert told James he was going to advertise the speed boat “for sale at $60,000 or near offer” on the Historic Speed Boat Club’s notice board. In response to the advertisement in the club Bert received a telephone call from Alphonse. Bert told Alphonse the speed boat was for sale “But someone has right of first refusal.” Alphonse then expressed surprise and asked Bert if he was selling or not. Bert said he was selling the speed boat for $60,000 or near offer and invited Alphonse to call and inspect the boat. Alphonse called on Bert and after inspecting the boat offered Bert $50,000 f

Alexander Hamilton stated in the Federalist Papers that the judiciary is the “least dangerous branch” of government, that it has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” The judiciary has nevertheless become a very powerful entity in our govern Alexander Hamilton stated in the Federalist Papers  that the judiciary is the “least dangerous branch” of government, that it has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.”  The judiciary has nevertheless become a very powerful entity in our government and issues decisions that have a profound impact on our republic.  Write a comprehensive essay in which you discuss the ways in which the judiciary has become powerful.  What checks or restraints does the president exercise over the judiciary?  Include in your discussion the president’s power to nominate members of the federal judiciary.  In your opinion, are these checks adequate? Place an order with similar or related instructions