Essay
(100 per cent of the mark for this assignment)
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics.
Word limit: 1200 words
This paper is for ( Litigation and dispute resolution ) course this course provides the cornerstone of the Litigation Law track. It introduces the theory and practice of litigation and other forms of dispute resolution, and draws upon the basic tools of decision theory, game theory, and economic analysis to address some of the key features of the litigation process and its institutions. Among the topics addressed are the decision to commence litigation and whether to settle or go to trial; settlement negotiations; strategic behavior as affecting decision making by both private actors and the courts; economic analyses of litigation; agency or moral hazard problems presented by both lawyers and courts; the impact of attorney’s fee arrangements, fee-shifting rules, and court-imposed sanctions; party versus court control of proceedings; and the effect of enforcement costs on competing substantive legal rules.
I will attache the outline of this paper, I want you to follow this order, and
Complete module 12 questions
1- Introduction 1500 -2000 words
2-The Literature Review between 4000-5000 words
3- Methodology about 3500-4500 words
4-Result and Finding 2000-3500 words
5-Conclusion and Recommendations 2000-3500
Johnny needs to buy a lawn mower. His lawn is relatively modest, so he began looking for an affordable model. His friend, Mark, also needed a lawn mower. His yard was much larger, so he went to Johnny and said “Johnny, we both need a lawn mower.
Why don’t we go shopping and get the lawn mower together.” Johnny and Mark found a suitable lawn mower for $10,000. Johnny actually talked to the salesmen. And the salesmen agreed to extend Johnny a loan to purchase the lawn mower if Mark would orally contract to stand as a surety for Johnny if the payments were not made on time.
For two months, Mark uses the lawn mower more than anyone. But then Johnny fails to make payments and the salesman sues Mark under the oral contract. What will be the likely disposition of the case?
Many public policy officials and business people object to the protest process in US government contracting.
Among other things, they assert that:
in the commercial world - it's unusual and counter-productive for vendors to sue their (prospective) clients - or, in other words - you don't bite the hand that feeds you;
protests delay the award of contracts and disrupt the government's ability to engage in the business of governance (e.g., serving the public, defending the nation, solving problems, etc.);
there are too many incentives for losers (or whiners) or disappointed offerors to protest - particularly when it comes to incumbent contractors on routine service contracts (such as food service or custodial contracts) - the protest process all but guarantees the incumbent two or three extra months of work on a contract they lost fair and square;
protests are expensive - they waste the government's scarce resources - and the only winners are the attorneys;
protests make government acqu
Many public policy officials and business people object to the protest process in US government contracting.
Among other things, they assert that:
in the commercial world - it's unusual and counter-productive for vendors to sue their (prospective) clients - or, in other words - you don't bite the hand that feeds you;
protests delay the award of contracts and disrupt the government's ability to engage in the business of governance (e.g., serving the public, defending the nation, solving problems, etc.);
there are too many incentives for losers (or whiners) or disappointed offerors to protest - particularly when it comes to incumbent contractors on routine service contracts (such as food service or custodial contracts) - the protest process all but guarantees the incumbent two or three extra months of work on a contract they lost fair and square;
protests are expensive - they waste the government's scarce resources - and the only winners are the attorneys;
protests make government acqu