Policy Analysis or Change is: The issue is the need for a statewide (and national) registry for staff in vulnerable adult group home facilities. This would necessitate a training curriculum for these staff which would certify them.(The idea is based on the certified nursing assistant registry). This would allow employers to check backgrounds related to group home employment now they do not require this. The MN Policy is related to this issue can be found in Minnesota Rules 9555.5105 on the dhs website abuse and neglect of patients related to unsafe staffing in residential group homes. List abuses and cases of neglect and tie them to lack of education of staff and owners in medical and mental health issues, short staffing, and anything else related to "unsafe staffing" you can find. While many adult foster care homes are operated by mental health providers or providers with knowledge of mental illnesses, some homes have staff with little or no training in mental health and no supervi

Is antenatal pelvic floor exercises significantly better than non-intervention in preventing urinary incontinence? Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

Evaluate current government mandated vaccination programs for school children; whether it is in public's best interest to have legislator's who don't know medicine mandating policy that directly affects how clinicians treat their patients. Paper that looks at the vaccine theory, for instance, high titers = immunity, and whether our government has the right reasons to have compulsory vaccinations for school children based on research mainly done by the manufacturers of said vaccines. Examples: How ethical is it for manufacturers to be involved in policy making, such as Merck with the state mandates trying to make HPV vaccine mandatory for girls to attend school? government vs. individual autonomy. What is the evidence that many vaccines come out to market with out being properly tested, resulting in unsafe vaccines. What are clinical cases, court cases, etc that show evidence to propose that vaccination policy in USA should be re-examined in light of new evidence in immunology that does

A national or regional health issue Among concerns in this category are obesity (among school age children), HIV/AIDS (and its relationship to risky sexual behavior within the heterosexual community); the role of poverty in health challenges. There may be others which interest you, and if so, do reflect on them. The first thing you will have to do is to decide on an issue, an issue/a controversy that interests you and that falls into one of the three topic categories above. Decide why it interests you. Your research will involve narrowing your topic and locating relevant support materials that will articulate a significant position on the discussion. You can not cover everything given the space limits and the time you have to complete the assignment. So, decide: -- What is the topic, the overall controversy? -- What do you already know about the debate?  Does it pertain to your particular field of study or to some other aspect of our life? -- List some key points about the issue t

1.  Do you believe the relationship between nurses and physicians is improved over years past?  Is there more of a professional relationship now? 2.  Are some physicians/nurses difficult to work with dependent on their area of expertise?  (ie..Pediatricians are easier to work with than Surgeons) 3.  What difficulties have you experienced and how did you handle it, and do you think you dealt with the situation well.  What would you do differently now? Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

As in Module 8, you will be required to read the two articles (“Yes, It Provides Protection For Children” by Steve and Gayle Francis and “No, It delays Access to Medical Care And Counseling” by Patricia Bellasaima) with opposing viewpoints on a very contentious matter (California State Proposition 4 in the 2008 general election). 1.    Print out and then quickly read each article to get an overall idea of each author’s argument. 2.    Next, thoroughly read each article, identifying purposes, conclusions, and premises and your own personal bias concerning the argument. . 3.    As you identify premises, take notes as to the possible fallacies or strengths each might have. 4.    Form your own conclusion. Base this upon the arguments presented by one or both of the authors as well as research of your own. 5.    Now you’re ready to write your final exam essay. 6.    Refer to the guide in Module 8 to steer you through the format of the essay. ?    Essay Guide

1.    Write your introduction and paper rough draft. a.    Write in your own words, do not copy from your sources. b.    Grammar and sentence structure will be reviewed. 2.    Select 40 (no more, no less) medical terms from the introduction and paper. 3.    Divide the paper into 5 parts as follows: a.    Part 1:  Face Sheet (Start on a separate sheet of paper) i.    Type “I.  Face Sheet” in the left upper corner. ii.    Type the topic of the paper in the middle of the page. iii.    Type your name, class and session, and date in the right lower corner. b.    Part 2:  Introduction (Start on a separate sheet of paper) i.    Type “II.  Introduction” in the upper left corner. ii.    Type only two to three sentences describing your topic. c.    Part 3:  Medical Terms (Start on a separate sheet of paper) i.    Type “III.  Medical Terms” in the left upper corner. ii.    Individually identify the 40 terms previously selected. 1

Scenario Mr. Frank Walker, a male patient, comes into your clinic and hands you the following pdf file from the internet.  He is very distraught, since he has just been diagnosed with prostate cancer and very confused.  His doctor is suggesting something called seed therapy.  He says “how can they put radioactivity in my body, isn’t all radioactivity bad for you?”  Your challenge is to calm him down and explain to him what is going to be happening.  The other component of the scenario is the fact your patient is highly educated, but not in the sciences, and he will not tolerate being talked down to and needs a sound explanation.  He hands you an information sheet with the following figure.  “What does this all mean he says?” Brachytherapy You are the supervisor of Mr. Walker’s primary nurse, Ms Allencia.  She is not quite sure how to address Mr. Walker’s question.  Write a memo/letter to Ms. Allencis which would help raise Ms. Allencia’s level of confidence in

1. identify a research topic in an area of interest - anything related to health care or biology. 2. describe the topic and terms associated with the background of the research 3. review related studies and research related to the chosen topic 4. present evidence for the importance of "your" question. Explain how it is different than what has been done, or how it is new. 5. state a hypothesis that will be used 6. 750-1000 words please                                                                                                                                      Place an order with similar or related instructions NOW

******Prompt****** You are baby Stephanie's doctor. You know she's in considerable pain, and all the medical evidence convinces you that she is going to die. You have three options: continue her treatment; slowly withdraw treatment, while keeping her "comfortable" and allow her to die naturally (passive euthanasia); intervene and end her suffering by ending her life (active euthanasia). Discuss your options, choose one and give reasons )medical, ethical, legal and psychological) for your choice.