1. Develop a release of information policy statement (suggested length of 1–2 sentences) using
either Montana Code 50-16-541 or Montana Code 50-16-542 for a policy book.
E. If you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.
Note: Please save word-processing documents as *.rtf (Rich Text Format) or *.pdf (Portable
Document Format) files.
Note: When bulleted points are present in the task prompt, the level of detail or support
called for in the rubric refers to those bulleted points.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link
included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, the submission
MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any
direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they
have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the paper or pr
I need the two part of the Discussion the method and result.
I need to discuss the strengths and limitations of the chosen method. And discuss how if I
achieved (or not) trustworthiness (credibility) and its belonging concepts.
In the method part I need critical and reasoned discussion that is relevant and related to
methodology, methodological problems, validity and transferability and in the result part
The main findings should reviewed critically. The findings are related to and interpreted
based on background and other research. The author�s reflections are reported. And to write
the conclusion and to clearly linked to the outcome.
can you use some of the references from the references list attached in the same documents
and it's ok to add new references the web references are not allowed.
I need the two part of the Discussion the method and result.
I need to discuss the strengths and limitations of the chosen method. And discuss how if I
achieved (or not) trustworthiness (credibility) and its belonging concepts.
In the method part I need critical and reasoned discussion that is relevant and related to
methodology, methodological problems, validity and transferability and in the result part
The main findings should reviewed critically. The findings are related to and interpreted
based on background and other research. The author�s reflections are reported. And to write
the conclusion and to clearly linked to the outcome.
can you use some of the references from the references list attached in the same documents
and it's ok to add new references the web references are not allowed.
Recent clinical guidelines suggest that watchful waiting is better than immediately
beginning treatment with antibiotics when a child presents with otitis media. A group of
nurses in the outpatient clinic decide to use evidence-based research for this practice to
help them understand whether this is the appropriate care for the children they see. If
they find it is grounded in the research, they will suggest a change in the clinical policy
guidelines. They are aware that this policy may be a concern for parents who are used to
getting antibiotics immediately when they bring their children to the clinics. The nurses
brought the following sources of evidence to their first meeting: ? American Academy of
Pediatrics and American Academy of Family Physicians. (2004.) Clinical practice guideline:
Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Retrieved May 17, 2008, from
https://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;113/5/1451 ? Block, S. L.
(1997). Causative pathogens,
The module is called Enhancing health and Social Care through Interprofessional Practice. i
am a paramedic student final year, but it is not only paramedics students who do this
module but we share it with other disciplinary such as
radiography,nurses,physiotherapy.social worker, radiotherapy and mental health, and we
worked also together as a group for the module purpose. Assessment guidelines as below: The
aim of the following piece of work is to demonstrate to your markers that you have met the
following learning outcome; ���Evaluate service delivery in relation to their professional
role’ In order to help you meet the limited word count you should use the following pro-
forma to write the key points on; •An evaluative account of your professional role within
the multi discipline/ agency team 1-Explain how your role fits within the multi-
disciplinary team/multi-agency team (50 words) 2-Explain how your knowledge and skills
enable to fulfil your role (200 words) •Profess
